Earlier I'd noted the 60 Chicago Tribune employees terminated on
August 8. 37 of the people were in Editorial, the other 23 were in
other departments. In addition to the 60 let go that day, Editorial
accepted voluntary layoffs of an additional 30 employees before the
8th.
Editorial was hit hard.
In fact, as you read about the situation, you forget there were
other people involved, "more than 40 colleagues at the
Tribune were told goodbye. More than 30 others were told to exit
last week, after stepping up to leave voluntarily. The departures
are part of a Tribune down-sizing measure to cut costs," according
to Chicago
Tribune writer Manya Brachear.
"The Tribune Casualty List: Here's an unofficial but
more or less complete list of editorial employees the Tribune is
leaving behind...," Michael Miner wrote in his
Chicago Reader Blog.
Only TellZell.com
mentioned there were more casualties. But it did not list people
who are not in editorial, "You'll find below a list of a couple
dozen names of the 80 or so people who have either been fired or
were given a buyout by the Chicago Tribune this week."
I'm trying to sort out when this sort of arrogance is otherwise
acceptable to journalists. For example, when airlines layoff pilots
and others, do they single out the pilots? Sometimes. When a
hospital or health service, such as Cook County, layoff employees,
are doctors and nurses given special treatment? Sometimes.
However, usually, the layoffs are discussed in terms of the total
numbers, including the number of pilots or doctors or nurses,
etc.
Also, the terms of the "involuntary separation" have not been
discussed anywhere. The Tribune is not paying these former
employees any separation, severance or benefits. If the employees
agree to provide the Tribune Co. with a blanket immunity from
future suits, however, they will receive a payout to their
non-taxable retirement accounts equal to one week for each six
months worked, to a maximum of 52 weeks; the right to purchase
their health benefits at the employee rate for up to three months;
and out-placement services.
In other words, these employees were called in on Friday, August
8th and terminated. And, they received nothing for their service.
And in return for a one-way immunity, they'll receive minimal
help.
Tagged: Chicago Reader, Michael Miner, Chicago Tribune
Discuss
Please log in or register to post your comment.